logolong

What the Papers say

More
15 years 8 months ago #22034 by Dorrie
Replied by Dorrie on topic Re:What the Papers say
Now we have another Police Officer who appears to give a woman a slap in the face, she still comes at him protesting, he brings her down with a baton to the legs.Is this acceptable, did he go too far, did she get what she deserved. I wonder if he is one of the men who thinks it's ok to give a woman a slap.:angry:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
15 years 8 months ago #22076 by
Replied by on topic Re:What the Papers say
Dorrie wrote:

Now we have another Police Officer who appears to give a woman a slap in the face, she still comes at him protesting, he brings her down with a baton to the legs.Is this acceptable, did he go too far, did she get what she deserved. I wonder if he is one of the men who thinks it's ok to give a woman a slap.:angry:



I havent seen any footage on this...But at face-value it looks as if another (understand he is a Sgt.)Policeman Lost-It xxxx :(

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 8 months ago #22078 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
the problem is that just because you are a female it dosn't give you the right to be swearing and in a males face because ppl belive no female should be slaped.. what would happen if a male was swearing and in a females face they would slap him across the face ..it works both ways ..dont slap each other :dry:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 8 months ago #22111 by Dorrie
Replied by Dorrie on topic Re:What the Papers say
Would appear said lady is getting a 50K deal out of this, guess who is her spokesman, yeah you guessed it Max Clifford. Something stinks:angry: Also agree with Ducky, being a female does not give you the right to be obnoxious:angry:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 years 8 months ago #22138 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
the e-mail scandle is going to be whitewashed under the carpet like the mps expensces.. it is fine for them to pry in to all are everyday lives but they dont want us to know about there everyday lives
I watched an interview done by Andrew neal, and a labour supporter member who runs a site and is in cohot with the ppl who sent the smear e-mails.. was self opinonated and ranting across him and the other person Andrew was interviewing.. which makes me wonder if the labour goverment are paying for that site out of are monny..a lot of the labour party members are discusted with there own partys aragance and bullying tacktics
ps I hope I dont come over self opinonated as I try to see both sides of the coin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Visitor
  • Visitor
15 years 8 months ago #22140 by
Replied by on topic Re:What the Papers say
Dorrie wrote:

Would appear said lady is getting a 50K deal out of this, guess who is her spokesman, yeah you guessed it Max Clifford. Something stinks:angry: Also agree with Ducky, being a female does not give you the right to be obnoxious:angry:


I find Max Cliffords role in all this stuff very strange...His daughter is disabled and in normal circustances would be entitled for State Support for living...As the State has no money of its own...it comes from what is available after taxes collected....all support depends on the Pot being as full as possible...
If this woman is awarded £50K it will come out of Taxes collected thus reducing available monies xxxx :ohmy: ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Able_Here_Team
Time to create page: 0.258 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 Able Here