logolong

What the Papers say

More
17 years 2 months ago #24642 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
Dorrie wrote:

ellie wrote:

Dorrie wrote:

Baby Peter's mother got 10yrs for her evil crimes.But could be out in 5, due to time already served.
Her boyfriend got 12yrs for breaking the little boy's back.Plus life for raping another 2yr old tot.
The lodger got 3yrs for letting it go on without trying to get help.

If anybody has a gun I am willing to pull the trigger, but I will shoot the Judge first.
This little boy lost his life, doesn't anybody care anymore.:angry: :angry: :evil:

Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:32<br><br>Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:36


the killing also should have been a life sentence ..in america they would have termed it two life sentences.. in other words untill they died :angry:


Totally agree, He could be out in 12yrs because of time already served,they could not be charged with killing Peter even though they recorded the torture on a mobile phone, this is now missing, so they cant prove murder, our legal system stinks, let's just hope someone gets them while they are in jail.:angry: :angry:

well the poor wee mite did not kill himself they killed him :angry: :angry: I keep saying the laws should be sorted out..as they stand right now it is all on the side of the crimials and not the vicims

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #24677 by Dorrie
Replied by Dorrie on topic Re:What the Papers say
I see the Catholic Church is bringing disgrace on itself again, abuse in their childrens homes and Orphanages. They tended to sweep these things under the carpet, also send the offenders off on Retreat somewhere until it all died down, also it seemed more prevalent in Ireland. I know the offences were committed many years ago, however the victims still need to feel it has been dealt with!!!!!!!:angry:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #24760 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
as I have said before I was in a roman catholic orphanage and did not suffer any abuse, It was a happy time for me..it seems like the boys got the worst of things in all of the places they where placed in... no matter who ran it that includes remand schools and borstal

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #24762 by Dorrie
Replied by Dorrie on topic Re:What the Papers say
ellie wrote:

as I have said before I was in a roman catholic orphanage and did not suffer any abuse, It was a happy time for me..it seems like the boys got the worst of things in all of the places they where placed in... no matter who ran it that includes remand schools and borstal


I totally agree with that my friend, being a Catholic myself, I was taught by nuns,I had no complaints to make against them.:)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tonypark
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
17 years 2 months ago #25227 by tonypark
Replied by tonypark on topic Re:What the Papers say
I see a Labour MP has been caught out with claiming £5 on his expenses ( paid by us) for money he put into church funds.......What a wonderful ironic connection.....Thieves and the Church....xxxx We will call that the parabel of ....The Thieving GIT xxxx B)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #25233 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
tonypark wrote:

I see a Labour MP has been caught out with claiming £5 on his expenses ( paid by us) for money he put into church funds.......What a wonderful ironic connection.....Thieves and the Church....xxxx We will call that the parabel of ....The Thieving GIT xxxx B)

every one of them claimed somthink from make up to moots and according to the papers they are putting in for as much as they can before the so called rules get changed
the three major parties have had a monopoly on what they can do in our name for yrs.. I have been saying for a long time that we need a few diffrent parties to come to the forfrront to stop them from being so arragant
sadly we could start to get that in a bad way but we the ppl kept letting them have the power even when there was not a hairs width diffents between their polices and never bothered to call them to acount ..they all sing from the same song sheet
no wonder the young and the old want a change
I know they claimed for exspences and that there where question marks about what they could claim for so I am guily as well for burying my head in the sand

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tonypark
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
17 years 2 months ago #25280 by tonypark
Replied by tonypark on topic Re:What the Papers say
The bottom line is...MPs are refered to an Honourable....I see no honour of any kind in that sewer they call Westminster xxxx :evil:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #25314 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
tonypark wrote:

The bottom line is...MPs are refered to an Honourable....I see no honour of any kind in that sewer they call Westminster xxxx :evil:

we might as well close down parliment if we stay in the EU as we will be run from brussles.. they say they are worried that if the BNP ever get in we will have a dicatorship.. we all ready have that now from are own lot in parliment and from the EU :evil:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #25346 by Dorrie
Replied by Dorrie on topic Re:What the Papers say
ducky wrote:

tonypark wrote:

The bottom line is...MPs are refered to an Honourable....I see no honour of any kind in that sewer they call Westminster xxxx :evil:

we might as well close down parliment if we stay in the EU as we will be run from brussles.. they say they are worried that if the BNP ever get in we will have a dicatorship.. we all ready have that now from are own lot in parliment and from the EU :evil:


Might as well vote BNP then:angry: :angry: :evil:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • tonypark
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
17 years 2 months ago #25373 by tonypark
Replied by tonypark on topic Re:What the Papers say
Dorrie wrote:

ducky wrote:

tonypark wrote:

The bottom line is...MPs are refered to an Honourable....I see no honour of any kind in that sewer they call Westminster xxxx :evil:

we might as well close down parliment if we stay in the EU as we will be run from brussles.. they say they are worried that if the BNP ever get in we will have a dicatorship.. we all ready have that now from are own lot in parliment and from the EU :evil:


Might as well vote BNP then:angry: :angry: :evil:




Too left-wing for my taste xxxx :whistle:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #25391 by ducky
Replied by ducky on topic Re:What the Papers say
ppl where angry about a lot of issues before the expences row broke out and the ression started
parliment did not listen,.. If you did not like it or spoke out their attude was tough we know what is best for you and we have the power to do what we like .. NOW they will learn that WE the ppl have a lot of power by using the one freedom we have the BALLET BOX..so everybody get out there and vote before that right is also taken away from you.....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 years 2 months ago #25392 by suzan
Replied by suzan on topic Re:What the Papers say
have got totally confused by all this stuff on telling me that certain votes will be wasted votes...re prop rep system of counting :unsure:

think ballot box should be renamed bullet box......seems like all votes will be like shooting ourselves in the head!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Able_Here_Team
Time to create page: 0.486 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 Able Here